California’s Groundwater Conditions, Semi-Annual Update: October 2023

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | October 12th, 2023

This semi-annual report presents data received by DWR as of August 31, 2023, and partially reflects the impacts of recent storms, flooding, and natural and managed aquife

This semi-annual report presents data received by DWR as of August 31, 2023, and partially reflects the impacts of recent storms, flooding, and natural and managed aquifer recharge. However, it should be noted that groundwater response is a slow process and takes months to years to fully respond to changes in surface water conditions.

California’s Water Market, By the Numbers, Update 2021

Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) | December 31st, 2021

This appendix serves as an update to the data on surface water trading and groundwater banking provided in the PPIC publication, California’s Water Market, By the Numb

This appendix serves as an update to the data on surface water trading and groundwater banking provided in the PPIC publication, California’s Water Market, By the Numbers: Update 2012 (Hanak and Stryjewski 2012). In each section, we describe data sources and methods and present summary statistics.

Estuary News, February 1993

San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP) | February 15th, 1993

Estuary News, October 2021

San Francisco Estuary Partnership (SFEP) | October 15th, 2021

From Climate Traces to Climate Insights: Future Scenarios Analysis for the California Central Valley

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | October 2nd, 2023

California Water Code Section 10004.6 requires the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) to quantify current and future water conditions in the state. This infor

California Water Code Section 10004.6 requires the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) to quantify current and future water conditions in the state. This information is published in the California Water Plan (Water Plan), which is updated every five years. Water managers and planners constantly face the challenges of planning for an uncertain future where the only constant is change. To address the potential future changes and mitigate the probable risks, water managers must consider and quantify uncertainties and their impacts on water system vulnerability. Although it is not possible to know for certain how population growth, land use decisions, climate, and other factors change over time, water planners must consider these system stressors in long-term planning to evaluate future risks and uncertainty. The Water Plan evaluates many alternative future scenarios as an integral part of its analytical approach to quantify system vulnerability under a range of population and urban growth scenarios, land use, and climate uncertainties.

Geologic Setting, Geohydrology, and Ground-Water Quality near the Helendale Fault in the Mojave River Basin, San Bernardino County, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | July 15th, 2003

The proximity of the Moja ve River groundwater basin to the highly urbanized Los Angeles region has resulted in rapid population growth and, consequently, an increase in

The proximity of the Moja ve River groundwater basin to the highly urbanized Los Angeles region has resulted in rapid population growth and, consequently, an increase in the demand for water. The Mojave River, the primary source of surface water for the region, normally is dry—except for periods of flow after intense storms; therefore, the region relies almost entirely on ground water to meet its agricultural and municipal needs. The area where the Helendale Fault intersects the Mojave River is of particular hydrogeologic interest because of its importance as a boundary between two water-management subareas of the Mojave Water Agency. The fault is the boundary between the upper Mojave River Basin (Oeste, Alto, and Este subareas) and the lower Mojave River Basin (Centro and Baja subareas); specifically, the fault is the boundary between the Alto and the Centro subareas. To obtain the information necessary to help better understand the hydrogeology of the area near the fault, multiple-well monitoring sites were installed, the surface geology was mapped in detail, and water-level and water-quality data were collected from wells in the study area.

Groundwater Conditions Report Water Year 2021

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | March 15th, 2022

Groundwater Hydraulics

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | January 1st, 1984

Published by the American Geophysical Union as part of the Water Resources Monograph Series, Volume 9. John Ferris's research has covered a broad range of hydrologic p

Published by the American Geophysical Union as part of the Water Resources Monograph Series, Volume 9. John Ferris's research has covered a broad range of hydrologic problems in groundwater, including pollution, storage, recharge, and pumping of groundwater; drainage design; hydraulics of aquifer systems; saltwater encroachment; and application of geophysics to groundwater development. These contributions have been made as a researcher and teacher of national and international renown during a career that has lasted more than four decades. During these four decades, the methodologies for application of hydraulics to solving groundwater problems have continued to evolve and improve. The development of aquifer test techniques and analytical solutions been coemonplace in the 1950's, 1960's, and early 1970's have increasingly been supplemented by the use of numerical methods and automated parameter estimation techniques.

Groundwater Management: The Use of Numerical Models

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | February 1st, 1980

Published by the American Geophysical Union as part of the Water Resources Monograph Series, Volume 5. The first proposal for an assessment of groundwater models follo

Published by the American Geophysical Union as part of the Water Resources Monograph Series, Volume 5. The first proposal for an assessment of groundwater models followed the 1973 meeting of the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), part of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU), in Kiel, Federal Republic of Germany. SCOPE invited the Holcomb Research Institute (HRI) of Butler University, Indianapolis, Indiana to undertake the assessment since it had just completed a critical evaluation of the roles of mathematical models in environmental decision?]making in the United States (HRI, 1976). An international steering committee, chaired by John Bredehoeft of the U.S. Geological Survey, was assembled for the proposed study. Yehuda Bachmat was the on?]site head of the project, having come to the Institute on a year's leave from his position as Director of Research, Hydrological Service of Israel.

Groundwater Modeling by the Finite Element Method

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | January 1st, 1989

Published by the American Geophysical Union as part of the Water Resources Monograph Series, Volume 13. The finite element method is now widely used to solve a variety

Published by the American Geophysical Union as part of the Water Resources Monograph Series, Volume 13. The finite element method is now widely used to solve a variety of important problems in the field of groundwater hydrology. Thus a clear understanding of the method is essential to scientists and engineers working in this field. The goal of this book is to provide the reader with the basic skills needed to use the finite element method to solve "real-world" problems. Examples are used throughout the text to illustrate each step in the solution process.