Mid-Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Mid-Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency (MKGSA) | December 18th, 2019

Midcoast Groundwater Study Phase III, San Mateo County, California

San Mateo County | June 4th, 2010

San Mateo County ‘Midcoast’ extends from northern Half Moon Bay to Devils Slide along Highway 1. It encompasses the communities of Montara, Moss Beach, Seal Cove, Pri

San Mateo County ‘Midcoast’ extends from northern Half Moon Bay to Devils Slide along Highway 1. It encompasses the communities of Montara, Moss Beach, Seal Cove, Princeton, El Granada, and Miramar. Domestic water is supplied to the southern part of the region by Coastside County Water District (CCWD), providing services from Half Moon Bay to Princeton, and by Montara Water and Sanitary District (MWSD) on the north, servicing Montara and Moss Beach. Private wells are scattered through both service districts and outlying areas. With the exception of CCWD, which meets much of its demand through long-term contractual agreements with San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, the source of domestic water is from local surface water and groundwater resources. The carrying capacity of the local resources may be considered as the population that can be sustained using conservation measures during an extended drought without undue stress to valued natural habitats.

Middle Santa Ana River Watershed TMDL Task Force

Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) | July 5th, 2018

The Task Force is an 18-agency collaborative effort organized by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. It was formed in January 2006 to coordinate water quality impr

The Task Force is an 18-agency collaborative effort organized by the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. It was formed in January 2006 to coordinate water quality improvement activities related to bacteria in the Middle Santa Ana River Watershed. The activities were designed to manage or eliminate sources of bacterial indicators in local waterbodies. The Task Force supports on-going source investigation efforts to identify major sources of bacterial indicators and to understand how to best address them. Task Force resources are allocated on a risk-reduction priority basis in order to achieve compliance where it will provide the greatest improvement in public health.

Mineral Resources of the Jacumba (In-ko-pah) Wilderness Study Area, Imperial County, California

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | January 1st, 1987

This report presents the results of a mineral survey of part of the Jacumba (In-ko-pah) Wilderness Study Area (CDCA-368) that was designated by the Bureau of Land Mana

This report presents the results of a mineral survey of part of the Jacumba (In-ko-pah) Wilderness Study Area (CDCA-368) that was designated by the Bureau of Land Management as suitable for mineral surveys. In this report, the area studied is referred to as the "wilderness study area", or simply "the study area." The study area encompasses approximately 28,443 acres in southwestern Imperial County, Calif. Field work for this report was carried out between 1983 and 1985. Numerous mines, prospects, and claims are present in the study area, but none are being actively mined or prospected. Three sites inside the study area have identified limestone resources that total about 1.8 million tons. Four areas in the northwestern, northern, and eastern parts of the study area have high potential for undiscovered limestone resources. Two north-trending belts in the western and eastern parts of the study area have low resource potential for tungsten.

Minerals of California Bulletin No. 113

State of California | February 15th, 1938

Minimizing the Impact of Cannabis Cultivation on California Lands and Waterways

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | February 17th, 2017

Following recent changes in state law and voter-approved initiatives, California’s commercial cultivation of cannabis for recreational and medical use is expected to gr

Following recent changes in state law and voter-approved initiatives, California’s commercial cultivation of cannabis for recreational and medical use is expected to grow significantly. The State Water Resources Control Board has adopted a state cannabis policy to set up strict environmental standards, and a permitting system to protect local surface water from dewatering, protect water habitat and prevent pollution in the state’s rivers and streams. Left unregulated, cannabis cultivation can pose serious threats to water quality and the environment. Cannabis cultivation impacts include the release of fertilizers, pesticides and other supplements that degrade water quality and threaten wildlife. Excessive water diversions can injure fish or even dewater smaller streams. The physical alteration of the land can harm stream habitat and wildlife by the sediment and debris that is deposited in waterways by unregulated cultivation. Overview: The State Water Board’s “Cannabis Cultivation Policy, Principles and Guidelines for Cannabis Cultivation” (Policy) will be implemented through a water quality permit and a water right. The water quality permit is referred to as a Statewide General Order for Cannabis Cultivation Activities (Cannabis General Order). The water right is referred to as a Cannabis Small Irrigation Use Registration. Tiered Approach: The Cannabis General Order consists of a tiered permit structure based on threat to water quality. Tier 1 Cannabis Cultivators have a disturbed area greater than 2,000 square feet and less than 1 acre (43,560 square feet). Tier 2 Cannabis Cultivators have a disturbed area equal to or greater than 1 acre.

Mining’s Toxic Legacy: An Initiative to Address Mining Toxins in the Sierra Nevada

Sierra Fund | March 1st, 2008

The purpose of this report is to present current information on the nature and extent of mining toxins in the Sierra, the problems they pose to human and environmental he

The purpose of this report is to present current information on the nature and extent of mining toxins in the Sierra, the problems they pose to human and environmental health, and recommendations for action to address these problems. This is accomplished by examining the best available science from the perspective of communities in the Gold Country, and directing the results to regional nonprofit organizations and local, state, federal, and tribal governments. The area considered by this Initiative is defined to be consistent with the State of California’s Sierra Nevada Conservancy service boundary. Areas of the Sierra Nevada in the State of Nevada were also considered as a secondary topic. This enabled the Initiative to address both the east and west sides of the Sierra, as well as some parts of the Cascade region, all of which were heavily impacted by historic mining. Though the impact of gold mining is the primary focus of the Initiative, gold prospectors found other commodities, including iron, copper, lead, silver, and tungsten which they then mined and sold. This report considers the impact of these mining activities as a secondary topic and in less detail.

Missing the Boat on Freshwater Fish Conservation in California

Conservation Letters (Society for Conservation Biology) | March 30th, 2016

Population growth and increasing water‐use pressures threaten California's freshwater ecosystems and have led many native fishes to the brink of extinction. To guide fi

Population growth and increasing water‐use pressures threaten California's freshwater ecosystems and have led many native fishes to the brink of extinction. To guide fish conservation efforts, we provide the first systematic prioritization of river catchments and identify those that disproportionately contribute to fish taxonomic diversity. Using high‐resolution range maps of exceptional quality, we also assess the representation of fish taxa within the state's protected areas and examine the concordance of high‐priority catchments with existing reserves and among distinct taxonomic groups. Although most of the state's native fishes are found within protected areas, only a small proportion of their ranges are represented. Few high‐priority catchments occur within protected areas, suggesting that fish conservation will require active management and targeted river restoration outside of reserves. These results provide the foundation for systematic freshwater conservation planning in California and for prioritizing where limited resources are allocated for fish recovery and protection.

Missing Water: The Uses and Flows of Water in the Colorado River Delta Region

Pacific Institute | September 1st, 2001

The Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security is pleased to announce the release of Missing Water: The Uses and Flows of Water in the Color

The Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security is pleased to announce the release of Missing Water: The Uses and Flows of Water in the Colorado River Delta Region. This new study describes the fate of the millions of acre-feet of water diverted from the Colorado River at and below Imperial Dam, and the total inflows to and outflows from the Colorado River delta region more generally. This study uses the classic hydrologic boundaries of the delta region described by Godfrey Sykes in 1937, encompassing some 3,325 square miles (8,611 square kilometers) in the states of Arizona, Baja California, California, and Sonora, including the Imperial, Mexicali, and San Luis valleys, Yuma Project lands, and the lower Coachella Valley. The study period examines the flows and uses of water in the years 1991-1998, divided into Flood and Non-Flood years to reflect the tremendous variability of mainstem Colorado River flows. Missing Water compiles flow data along the mainstem and along diversions within the delta region, the first time such data has been compiled for the region as a whole. The study also report consumptive uses of water in the agricultural and urban sectors, and estimates such use by the environment. Agricultural use is also reported for the major crops in the region, both by acreage and by water use.

Mission Bay Historical Ecology Reconnaissance Study: Data Collection Summary (Technical Report)

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | February 1st, 2016

The goals of the Mission Bay Historical Ecology Reconnaissance Study were to collect and compile high-priority historical data about the Mission Bay landscape, identify

The goals of the Mission Bay Historical Ecology Reconnaissance Study were to collect and compile high-priority historical data about the Mission Bay landscape, identify sources that could help to develop a deeper understanding of early ecological conditions, and to identify future possible research directions based on the available data. This technical memorandum is intended to document the archives consulted during the reconnaissance study, summarize the collected and compiled data, and to identify potential next steps. A separate technical presentation to project staff and advisors will summarize the preliminary findings and questions generated from a review of the historical dataset. Ultimately, this research is intended to support the San Diego Audubon Society’s Mission Bay Wetlands Conceptual Restoration Plan (CRP) and the ReWild Mission Bay project. Also on this topic: Mission Bay Historical Ecology Reconnaissance Study: Data CollectionSummary and Initial Findings (Presentation)