Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 2018 Annual Owens Valley Report

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (LADWP) | December 1st, 2017

This report includes Los Angeles Department of Water and Power’s (LADWP) proposed Owens Valley Operations Plan for the 2018-2019 Runoff Year, an update on Owens Valley

This report includes Los Angeles Department of Water and Power’s (LADWP) proposed Owens Valley Operations Plan for the 2018-2019 Runoff Year, an update on Owens Valley conditions, and the current status of LADWP’s environmental mitigation projects and other legal obligations under the Agreement between the County of Inyo and the City of Los Angeles and its Department of Water and Power on a Long-Term Groundwater Management Plan for Owens Valley and Inyo County (Water Agreement); the 1991 Environmental Impact Report Water from the Owens Valley to Supply the Second Los Angeles Aqueduct, 1970 to 1990, 1990 Onward, Pursuant to a Long Term Groundwater Management Plan (1991 EIR); the Laws Type E transfer; the 1997 Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, County of Inyo, the California Department of Fish and Game, the California State Lands Commission, the Sierra Club, and the Owens Valley Committee (1997 MOU), the August 2004 and March 2010 Amended Stipulations and Orders in Case No. S1CVCV01-29768.

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Geologic Guidebook Los Angeles Aqueduct System

Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (LADWP) | December 1st, 1977

Los Angeles Sustainable Water Project: Ballona Creek Watershed

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) | November 1st, 2015

Implementing integrated water management systems (IWM) that incorporate all components of the urban water cycle, including imported water, local groundwater, captured st

Implementing integrated water management systems (IWM) that incorporate all components of the urban water cycle, including imported water, local groundwater, captured stormwater, greywater, and treated wastewater is crucial to creating a sustainable water supply for the city of Los Angeles (City). The City has researched, written, and initiated implementation of recommendations from many reports critical to creating an IWM plan for the City as well as to defining the current capacity of the system. While work on this issue has been ongoing for many years, the extreme drought currently impacting water supplies throughout California has created a new urgency to increase the City’s ability to provide a secure water supply through local sources. In April 2015, Governor Brown directed the first-ever statewide mandatory cut of 25% in urban water use due to the continuing drought conditions. In addition to statewide efforts, many policies and plans have been created on a local level within the City that address urban water management, integrated resources planning, stormwater capture, and groundwater management. The Los Angeles Mayor’s Office recently set strong goals to increase the sustainability of the City’s water supply over the next several years. The goals included completing a comprehensive sustainability plan containing objectives for water supply and demand in the City, which was released in April 2015 (Sustainable City pLAn). In an emergency drought directive released in October 2014, the Mayor identified additional accelerated water goals including reducing per capita potable water use by 20% by 2017 (from 2014 base-line of 130 gallons per capita per day (GPCD) to 104 GPCD), reducing the City’s reliance on MWD water by 50% by 2025, and converting 85% of public golf course acreage to recycled water by 2017. Through building upon regional research and reports that have been generated on potential components of the local water supply portfolio (e.g., groundwater, recycled water, and stormwater), as well as gathering and analyzing current data on flows of water and wastewater throughout the City systems and environment, this project further identifies and refines opportunities to implement integrated water management throughout the City. As water quality regulation in the Los Angeles area currently drives much of the current water management practices, we examined greater water self-reliance through this lens. Therefore, the City has been divided by watershed to assess Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) compliance alongside integrated water management opportunities and challenges that exist and must be addressed in order to meet water quality compliance requirements and maximize local water supply. This first report focuses on the Ballona Creek Watershed and the Hyperion Service Area; following reports will focus on the Dominguez Channel and Los Angeles River watersheds.

Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. State Water Resources Control Board

Second Appellate District, Court of Appeal of the State of California | February 27th, 2023

Los Osos Community Services District v. Golden State Water Company

Superior Court of California, County of San Luis Obispo | October 14th, 2015

This Stipulated Judgment concerns the Los Osos Groundwater Basin, as it is more particularly described in Sections 1.4.2 and 2.1 of this Stipulated Judgment, which underl

This Stipulated Judgment concerns the Los Osos Groundwater Basin, as it is more particularly described in Sections 1.4.2 and 2.1 of this Stipulated Judgment, which underlies the unincorporated communities of Los Osos, Baywood Park and Cuesta-by-the-Sea in San Luis Obispo County, California (“Basin”). The Basin is the only source of water for residential, commercial, institutional and agricul-tural development on properties overlying the Basin. This litigation (the “Action”) relates to efforts by the parties to sustainably manage the water resources of the Basin and to protect and promote the economic, environmental and social health of the community.

Los Osos Valley Groundwater Basin Fringe Areas Characterization

San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District | May 22nd, 2018

The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) took effect on January 1, 2015, and requires that certain actions be taken in groundwater basins designated as either hi

The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) took effect on January 1, 2015, and requires that certain actions be taken in groundwater basins designated as either high or medium priority by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), including Los Osos Basin. DWR identified the Los Osos Basin as a high priority basin subject to critical conditions of overdraft due to seawater intrusion and nitrate impairment (DWR, 2014, 2016). SGMA does not apply to the Los Osos Basin area that is at issue in Los Osos Community Services District v. Southern California Water Company [Golden State Water Company], et al.1 (Adjudicated Plan Area), for which a Stipulated Judgment was approved in San Luis Obispo Superior Court on October 14, 2015. The boundaries of the Adjudicated Plan Area do not coincide with the Basin boundaries as documented in DWR’s Interim Update to Bulletin 118 (2016). The groundwater basin areas between the Bulletin 118 Basin boundaries (Basin 3‐8) and the Adjudicated Plan Area boundary are referred to as “Fringe Areas” (Figure 1). In order to comply with SGMA, the County of San Luis Obispo (County) formed the Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) over these Fringe Areas on April 4, 2017. The results of this basin characterization study are intended to produce a basis of knowledge for use in boundary modification requests and potential future use in development of a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP). Decades of technical studies on the basin have focused primarily on aquifers within the Adjudicated Plan Area. This technical memorandum supplements prior work, which together provide a comprehensive hydrogeologic characterization and conceptual model of the Fringe Areas.

Losses of Sacramento River Chinook Salmon and Delta Smelt to Entrainment in Water Diversions in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | June 30th, 2008

Pumping at the water export facilities in the southern Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta kills fish at and near the associated fish-salvage facilities. Correlative analyses of

Pumping at the water export facilities in the southern Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta kills fish at and near the associated fish-salvage facilities. Correlative analyses of salvage counts with population indices have failed to provide quantitative estimates of the magnitude of this mortality. I estimated the proportional losses of Sacramento River Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) to place these losses in a population context. The estimate for salmon was based on recoveries of tagged smolts released in the upper Sacramento River basin, and recovered at the fish-salvage facilities in the south Delta and in a trawling program in the western Delta. The proportion of fish salvaged increased with export flow, with a mean value around 10% at the highest export flows recorded. Mortality was around 10% if pre-salvage losses were about 80%, but this value is nearly unconstrained. Losses of adult delta smelt in winter and young delta smelt in spring were estimated from salvage data (adults) corrected for estimated pre-salvage survival, or from trawl data in the southern Delta (young). These losses were divided by population size and accumulated over the respective seasons. Losses of adult delta smelt were 1–50% (median 15%) although the highest value may have been biased upward. Daily losses of larvae and juveniles were 0–8%, and seasonal losses accumulated were 0–25% (median 13%). The effect of these losses on population abundance was obscured by subsequent 50-fold variability in survival from summer to fall.

Lower Basin Alternative for the Post-2026 Coordinated Operation of the Colorado River Basin

Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) | March 6th, 2024

Lower Colorado River Basin Plan letter to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 5/22/23

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) | May 22nd, 2023

Lower Colorado River Mainstream Evaporation and Riparian Evapotranspiration Losses Report

U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) | February 8th, 2024

On August 16, 2022, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and Department of the Interior announced several administrative actions for consideration to improve and prote

On August 16, 2022, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and Department of the Interior announced several administrative actions for consideration to improve and protect the long-term sustainability of the Colorado River System. The System is currently experiencing prolonged drought and low runoff conditions accelerated by climate change that have led to historically low water levels in Lakes Powell and Mead (Reclamation, 2021). One of the actions included reviewing and prioritizing additional administrative initiatives to address system losses in the lower Colorado River mainstream. As part of that action, this report provides an overview of historical mainstream evaporation and riparian evapotranspiration (ET) losses along the lower Colorado River and presents methodologies used to develop those datasets. This report does not make recommendations on how to account for system losses in the lower Colorado River mainstream. Supplemental documents: Appendix 1 – Reaches Identified in the Lower Colorado River Mainstream Evaporation and Riparian Evapotranspiration Losses Report Appendix 2 – LCRAS Open Water Monthly Evaporative Losses Appendix 3 – Lake Mead, Lake Mohave, and Lake Havasu Evaporation from Reclamation’s Hydrologic Database (HDB) Appendix 4 – LCRAS Riparian Monthly Evapotranspiration Losses by Vegetation Appendix 5 – Evaporation and Riparian Evapotranspiration (ET) Coefficients Appendix 6 – Evaporation and Riparian Evapotranspiration (ET) Rates