System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Strategy Formulation and Refinement

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | March 3rd, 2014

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is conducting a system reoperation study (SRS) in cooperation with other State and federal agencies, local water distri

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is conducting a system reoperation study (SRS) in cooperation with other State and federal agencies, local water districts, groundwater managers, and other stakeholders, to identify potential strategies for reoperation of the statewide flood protection and water supply systems. The opportunity to reoperate portions of California’s statewide water system to yield increased water resources-related benefits was recognized by the State Legislature in Senate Bill X2 1 (SB X2 1) (Perata, 2008 – Water Code Section 83002.5). California’s statewide water system is comprised of a multitude of local, state, and federal projects. These projects include facilities such as dams and reservoirs, hydropower plants, canals, and water diversion structures. Many of these facilities were developed in the early to mid-20th century, and were not designed, constructed, or operated as an integrated water supply and flood management system. Over time, operations of the two largest water supply projects, the State Water Project (SWP), operated by DWR and the Central Valley Project (CVP), operated by the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), have been integrated to a certain degree. California’s water supply and flood management infrastructure is physically interconnected to the extent that it is technically feasible to move water around the system from Trinity County in the north to Imperial County in the south. However, the management of the water system is not as well integrated as it could be. The underlying logic of the SRS is that California can do much more with its existing water infrastructure by taking advantage of the physical interconnections (and enhancing them) while also operating the system in a coordinated manner to optimize the benefits. The current focus of the SRS is the Central Valley because this region has the highest integration of water supply and flood management facilities. Additionally, the greatest potential for ecosystem restoration through infrastructure reoperation is found in the Central Valley because the existing infrastructure has had a profound effect on aquatic ecosystems. RELATED DOCUMENTS: System Reoperation Study, Phase 1: Plan of Study System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Strategy Formulation and Refinement System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Appendix A: Forecast?Based Operations Analysis System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Appendix B: Tradeoff Analysis System Reoperation Study, Phase 3 Report: Assessment of Reoperation Strategies System Reoperation, Phase 3: Appendix C: State Water Project and Central Valley Project Integrated Operations Analysis System Reoperation, Phase 3 Appendix D: Ecosystem Evaluation

System Reoperation Study, Phase 3 Report: Assessment of Reoperation Strategies

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | August 21st, 2017

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is conducting a System Reoperation Study (SRS) in cooperation with other State and federal agencies, local water distri

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is conducting a System Reoperation Study (SRS) in cooperation with other State and federal agencies, local water districts, groundwater managers, and other stakeholders, to identify potential strategies for reoperation of the statewide flood protection and water supply systems. The opportunity to reoperate portions of California’s statewide water system to yield increased water resources-related benefits was recognized by the State Legislature in Senate Bill X2 1 (SB X2 1) (Perata 2008). In support of the legislative objectives, DWR developed the SRS to identify viable reoperation strategies and understand how integrated management can: • Improve the reliability of municipal and irrigation water supply. • Reduce flood hazards. • Restore and protect ecosystems. • Buffer the hydrologic variations expected from climate change. • Improve water quality. California’s statewide water system is composed of a multitude of local, State, and federal projects. These projects include dams and reservoirs, hydropower plants, canals, and water diversion structures. Many of these facilities were developed in the early to mid-20th century, and were not designed, constructed, or operated as an integrated water supply and flood management system. Over time, operations of the two largest water supply projects, the State Water Project (SWP), operated by DWR, and the Central Valley Project (CVP), operated by the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), have been integrated to a certain degree. California’s water supply and flood management infrastructure is physically interconnected to the extent that it is technically feasible to move water around the system, from Trinity County in the north to Imperial County in the south. However, the management of the water system is not as well integrated as it could be. The underlying logic of the SRS is that California can do much more with its existing water infrastructure by taking advantage of the physical interconnections (and enhancing them) while also operating the system in a coordinated manner to optimize the benefits. The current focus of the SRS is the Central Valley, because this region has the highest integration of water supply and flood management facilities. Additionally, the greatest potential for ecosystem restoration through infrastructure reoperation is found in the Central Valley, because the existing infrastructure has had a profound effect on aquatic ecosystems. Figure ES-1 shows the location of the Central Valley and the study area for the SRS. Figure 1-1 also shows major features of the CVP and SWP. RELATED DOCUMENTS: System Reoperation Study, Phase 1: Plan of Study System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Strategy Formulation and Refinement System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Appendix A: Forecast?Based Operations Analysis System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Appendix B: Tradeoff Analysis System Reoperation Study, Phase 3 Report: Assessment of Reoperation Strategies System Reoperation, Phase 3: Appendix C: State Water Project and Central Valley Project Integrated Operations Analysis System Reoperation, Phase 3 Appendix D: Ecosystem Evaluation

System Reoperation, Phase 3 Appendix D: Ecosystem Evaluation

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | August 21st, 2017

Senate Bill (SB) X2 1 mandated and allocated resources for “planning and feasibility studies to identify potential options for the reoperation of the state's flood prot

Senate Bill (SB) X2 1 mandated and allocated resources for “planning and feasibility studies to identify potential options for the reoperation of the state's flood protection and water supply systems that will optimize the use of existing facilities and groundwater storage capacity.” Specifically, SB X2 1 stipulated that the studies shall be designed to determine the potential to achieve integration of flood protection and water supply systems to increase water supply reliability and flood protection, improve water quality, and provide for ecosystem protection and restoration. For this evaluation, a suite of ecosystem evaluation metrics were developed to evaluate the effects of reoperation scenarios simulated in Phases II and III of the SRP. Phase II reoperation scenarios were used to develop and test the ecosystem evaluation framework, and to quantify the effects of reoperation at Shasta and Oroville paired with conjunctive use and spring pulse flows. The next step was studying the ecosystem effects of Forecast-Based-Operation (FBO) at Shasta and Oroville combined with conjunctive use and spring pulse flows. Finally, t additional scenarios were developed and evaluated to explore the sensitivity of ecosystem performance to FBO and the potential for reoperation to enhance major ongoing ecosystem restoration efforts in the system. The purpose of this report is to document and describe the methods and results from the ecosystem evaluation to date, and to outline additional steps that could optimize reoperation scenarios for ecosystem improvement. RELATED DOCUMENTS: System Reoperation Study, Phase 1: Plan of Study System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Strategy Formulation and Refinement System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Appendix A: Forecast?Based Operations Analysis System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Appendix B: Tradeoff Analysis System Reoperation Study, Phase 3 Report: Assessment of Reoperation Strategies System Reoperation, Phase 3: Appendix C: State Water Project and Central Valley Project Integrated Operations Analysis System Reoperation, Phase 3 Appendix D: Ecosystem Evaluation

System Reoperation, Phase 3: Appendix C: State Water Project and Central Valley Project Integrated Operations Analysis

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | August 21st, 2017

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is conducting a system reoperation study (SRS) in cooperation with other state and federal agencies, local water distri

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is conducting a system reoperation study (SRS) in cooperation with other state and federal agencies, local water districts, groundwater managers, and other stakeholders to identify potential strategies for reoperation of the statewide flood protection and water supply systems. The opportunity to reoperate portions of California’s statewide water system to yield increased water resources–related benefits was recognized by the State Legislature in Senate Bill (SB) X2 1 (Perata, 2008 – Water Code Section 83002.5). In support of the legislative objectives, DWR developed the SRS to identify viable reoperation strategies and understand how integrated management can: • Improve the reliability of municipal and irrigation water supply • Reduce flood hazards • Restore and protect ecosystem function and habitat conditions • Buffer the hydrologic variations expected from climate change • Improve water quality A component of the SRS is to evaluate how operational improvements of the state and federal water Projects in California may increase water supply and enhance ecosystem function and habitat. The Central Valley Project (CVP) generally has more storage and less conveyance flexibility; the opposite is generally true for the State Water Project (SWP). The SWP and CVP are operated by DWR and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), respectively. The operation of the two Projects is coordinated in accordance with the 1986 Coordinated Operating Agreement and other agreements. Though the operation is coordinated, the SWP and CVP are operating as two distinct units. They each have different contractual obligations and operating constraints. Operational improvements using strengths and assets of both Projects may result in improved operational efficiency and help achieve goals of the SRS. The purpose of this effort is to assess potential benefits of operating the SWP and CVP as a single, integrated Project. RELATED DOCUMENTS: System Reoperation Study, Phase 1: Plan of Study System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Strategy Formulation and Refinement System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Appendix A: Forecast?Based Operations Analysis System Reoperation Study, Phase 2: Appendix B: Tradeoff Analysis System Reoperation Study, Phase 3 Report: Assessment of Reoperation Strategies System Reoperation, Phase 3: Appendix C: State Water Project and Central Valley Project Integrated Operations Analysis System Reoperation, Phase 3 Appendix D: Ecosystem Evaluation

Systematic Screening of Dams for Environmental Flow Assessment and Implementation

Oxford University Press (OUP) | November 30th, 2014

Systems Analysis and Optimization of Local Water Supplies in Los Angeles

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) | September 1st, 2017

Los Angeles, which relies on large infrastructure systems that import water over hundreds of miles, faces a future of reduced imports. Within Los Angeles and its hund

Los Angeles, which relies on large infrastructure systems that import water over hundreds of miles, faces a future of reduced imports. Within Los Angeles and its hundreds of water agencies, the capacity to adapt to future changes is influenced by laws, institutions, and hydrogeology. This paper presents a systems analysis of urban water management in metropolitan Los Angeles County to assess opportunities for increasing local water reliance. A network flow model was developed to investigate management tradeoffs across engineered, social, and environmental systems. With an aggressive regional demand target, increased stormwater capture (300%), and prioritized water reuse from existing facilities, imported water supplies can be cut by 30% while maintaining landscapes, economic productivity, and groundwater resources. Further reducing imports (by 40–50%) is possible through actions to promote additional reuse, recharge, conservation, and groundwater access. Reducing imported water without significant conservation results in likely groundwater overdraft. Fragmented networks of agencies in Los Angeles create an uneven landscape of vulnerability to water shortages. The paper discusses model applications, research needs, and policy implications of results for dry-climate cities.

Tahoe: State of the Lake Report 2025

University of California, Davis (UC Davis) | July 18th, 2025

UC Davis has conducted research at Lake Tahoe since 1950, and scientists from UC Davis Tahoe Environmental Research Center have been monitoring conditions at the lake con

UC Davis has conducted research at Lake Tahoe since 1950, and scientists from UC Davis Tahoe Environmental Research Center have been monitoring conditions at the lake continuously since 1968. This has created a unique document of change for one of the world’s most iconic and vulnerable lakes.

Talbert Seawater Intrusion Barrier Operations & Maintenance Manual

Orange County Water District (OCWD) | March 15th, 2023

OCWD’s Talbert Seawater Barrier (Talbert Barrier, Barrier) has been in operation since 1976. Since 1976 the Barrier has undergone many changes including new well design

OCWD’s Talbert Seawater Barrier (Talbert Barrier, Barrier) has been in operation since 1976. Since 1976 the Barrier has undergone many changes including new well designs and improved injection water quality. Since 2008, the Talbert Barrier has been injecting advanced treated wastewater from OCWD’s GWRS treatment plant. This manual will examine in detail the various types of injection wells, their operational procedures and the procedures followed to monitor the quality of the injection water and evaluate injection well performance. Due to size, this document has been divided. Part 1, Part 2

Taming wildfires in the context of climate change: The case of the United States

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) | January 22nd, 2024

Shifts in climate cycles (e.g., Pacific Decadal Oscillation, El Niño-Southern Oscillation), combined with ongoing changes in drought, temperature and snowmelt, together,

Shifts in climate cycles (e.g., Pacific Decadal Oscillation, El Niño-Southern Oscillation), combined with ongoing changes in drought, temperature and snowmelt, together, have contributed to the overall warmer, drier conditions that fuel extreme wildfires (Environmental Protection Agency, 2022[4]; Kitzberger et al., 2007[10]; Westerling, 2016[11]). The period with the largest increase in area burned coincides with many of the warmest years on record nationwide (Environmental Protection Agency, 2022[4]). Such changes are especially visible in the western United States, where the peak extent of area burned now occurs about one month earlier than just two decades ago. Other factors including longer dry seasons and drier soils and vegetation are increasingly creating the conditions for catastrophic wildfires (Environmental Protection Agency, 2022[4]; US Global Change Research Program, 2018[9]). Wildfires are also further spreading into areas historically unaccustomed to fire, including high elevation areas in the west of the country (Figure 1.2) (OECD, 2023[2]; Alizadeh et al., 2021[12]), which may be less prepared for wildfires and potentially harmed by its impacts.

Tap Water Affordability in Arizona

Arizona State University (ASU) | February 20th, 2025

In this report, the Kyl Center for Water Policy presents a comprehensive set of tap water affordability data for community water systems (CWS) in Arizona. Communities can

In this report, the Kyl Center for Water Policy presents a comprehensive set of tap water affordability data for community water systems (CWS) in Arizona. Communities can use this study to better assess how their current and future charges for water impact low- and median-income households. Water access can be improved when water charges are designed with affordability in mind so that fewer families face the risk of disconnection due to non-payment. On the other hand, most water providers rely on fees to pay for replacing aging infrastructure and water system improvements to ensure reliability.