Lower Tule River Irrigation District Groundwater Sustainability Agency Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Lower Tule River Irrigation District Groundwater Sustainability Agency | January 21st, 2020

Lower Tule River Irrigation District Groundwater Sustainability Plan San, Joaquin - Tule Subbasin

Lower Tule River Irrigation District Groundwater Sustainability Agency | July 19th, 2023

This Plan addresses the items identified in the SGMA regulations specific to the Agency, including descriptions of the physical characteristics, the water budget (histor

This Plan addresses the items identified in the SGMA regulations specific to the Agency, including descriptions of the physical characteristics, the water budget (historic and future), specific monitoring features and locations, quantifiable targets and minimum thresholds for depth to groundwater, groundwater storage, groundwater quality, and land subsidence between 2020 and 2040, and those projects and management actions proposed to implement during the 20 year planning horizon to achieve the Sustainability Goal.

Machine learning based downscaling of GRACE-estimated groundwater in Central Valley, California

Science of the Total Environment (Elsevier) | January 9th, 2023

California's Central Valley, one of the most agriculturally productive regions, is also one of the most stressed aquifers in the world due to anthropogenic groundwater ov

California's Central Valley, one of the most agriculturally productive regions, is also one of the most stressed aquifers in the world due to anthropogenic groundwater over-extraction primarily for irrigation. Groundwater depletion is further exacerbated by climate-driven droughts. Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite gravimetry has demonstrated the feasibility of quantifying global groundwater storage changes at uniform monthly sampling, though at a coarse resolution and is thus impractical for effective water resources management. Here, we employ the Random Forest machine learning algorithm to establish empirical relationships between GRACE-derived groundwater storage and in situ groundwater level variations over the Central Valley during 2002–2016 and achieved spatial downscaling of GRACE-observed groundwater storage changes from a few hundred km to 5 km. Validations of our modeled groundwater level with in situ groundwater level indicate excellent Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficients ranging from 0.94 to 0.97. In addition, the secular components of modeled groundwater show good agreements with those of vertical displacements observed by GPS, and CryoSat-2 radar altimetry measurements and is perfectly consistent with findings from previous studies. Our estimated groundwater loss is about 30 km3 from 2002 to 2016, which also agrees well with previous studies in Central Valley. We find the maximum groundwater storage loss rates of −5.7 ± 1.2 km3 yr−1 and -9.8 ± 1.7 km3 yr−1 occurred during the extended drought periods of January 2007–December 2009, and October 2011–September 2015, respectively while Central Valley also experienced groundwater recharges during prolonged flood episodes. The 5-km resolution Central Valley-wide groundwater storage trends reveal that groundwater depletion occurs mostly in southern San Joaquin Valley collocated with severe land subsidence due to aquifer compaction from excessive groundwater over withdrawal.

Madera Subbasin Joint Groundwater Sustainability Plan

Madera Subbasin Coordination Committee | January 31st, 2022

The Madera Subbasin is identified by California Department of Water Resources (DWR) as a critically overdrafted basin. Therefore, the Madera Subbasin GSAs must develop,

The Madera Subbasin is identified by California Department of Water Resources (DWR) as a critically overdrafted basin. Therefore, the Madera Subbasin GSAs must develop, adopt, and submit a GSP (or GSPs) to DWR for the entire Madera Subbasin by January 31, 2020. The Madera Subbasin is managed by seven GSAs, of which four (City of Madera GSA, Madera Irrigation District GSA, Madera County GSA, and Madera Water District GSA) have developed a joint GSP (attached here) and three (Gravelly Ford Water District GSA, New Stone Water District GSA, and Root Creek Water District GSA) have developed individual GSPs.

Mainstreaming Potable Water Reuse in the United States: Strategies for Leveling the Playing Field

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) | April 18th, 2018

The practice of potable water reuse has evolved in important ways in the United States over the past 50 years, especially during the last 25 years. Prior to the 1990s, m

The practice of potable water reuse has evolved in important ways in the United States over the past 50 years, especially during the last 25 years. Prior to the 1990s, many cities and public health regulators recognized that municipal wastewater effluent accounted for a significant fraction of the surface water entering their drinking water treatment plants. Wastewater utilities generally addressed this situation by treating and disinfecting effluent consistent with Clean Water Act permitting requirements and, where feasible, minimizing the fraction of wastewater in drinking water intakes. Because of concerns associated with the presence of wastewater and contaminants from other sources (e.g., industrial pollution, agricultural runoff), some cities began to upgrade drinking water treatment plants by installing advanced treatment technologies to provide enhanced safeguards for public health protection. As water availability and water quality issues became more prevalent in rapidly growing areas, water managers soon began to explicitly consider the use of wastewater effluent to augment water supplies.

Major carbon-14 anomaly in a regional carbonate aquifer—Possible evidence for megascale channeling, south-central Great Basin

American Geophysical Union (AGU) | December 1st, 1976

The carbon 14 content of groundwater at the center of a 16‐km‐long fault‐controlled spring line at Ash Meadows in south central Nevada is 5 times greater than that

The carbon 14 content of groundwater at the center of a 16‐km‐long fault‐controlled spring line at Ash Meadows in south central Nevada is 5 times greater than that in water from other major springs along the lineament. The difference in carbon 14 stands in marked contrast to the near identity of all springwaters in alkalinity, pH, carbon 13, oxygen 18, deuterium, tritium, and other major and trace ions. Ten possible explanations of this major carbon 14 anomaly are evaluated by using all available chemical and isotopic data from basin‐wide wells and upland springs tapping the regional carbonate aquifer discharging at Ash Meadows. The four most plausible hypotheses require the presence of a major longitudinal heterogeneity in the distal portion of the groundwater basin to explain the anomaly. Flow channeling with an amplitude of at least 11 km is indicated. The simplifying assumption commonly used in simulation of basin‐wide flow through fractured or solution‐riddled aquifers, namely, that the aquifer is ‘homogenous in its heterogeneity,’ is not applicable to the dense fractured Paleozoic carbonate rocks comprising the Nevada aquifer; heterogeneities in this aquifer do not cancel each other areally.

Major ground-water flow systems in the Great Basin region of Nevada, Utah, and adjacent state

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | July 1st, 1988

Majority of global river flow sustained by groundwater

Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) | July 19th, 2024

Groundwater-sustained baseflow is a vital source of river flow, especially during dry seasons. The proportion of river flow sustained by baseflow—the baseflow index—i

Groundwater-sustained baseflow is a vital source of river flow, especially during dry seasons. The proportion of river flow sustained by baseflow—the baseflow index—is essential for assessing fluvial nutrient cycling and contaminant transport. However, the global baseflow index remains highly uncertain, with current Earth system model simulations ranging from 12% to 94%. Here we estimate the global baseflow index to be 59% ± 7% based on an emergent constraint approach, which integrates 50 Earth system models with baseflow indices derived from streamflow observations in 15,567 basins. Our observational constraint indicates that at least 21% ± 3% of precipitation recharges groundwater, which is approximately double the figure reported in the Sixth Assessment Report of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Thus, our research suggests a more active role of groundwater in the global water cycle than most Earth system models currently simulate. We present evidence that the considerable disagreement in simulated baseflow stems from unrealistic and varied model representations of infiltration, aquifer structure and groundwater dynamics. These processes should be prioritized so that models can capture active groundwater–river connections.

Making Conservation a California Way of Life - Revised

California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) | March 12th, 2024

Making Green Infrastructure Work in the Bay Area

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | July 1st, 2016