Integrated Regional Water Management – California Water Library

Page

Showing
1-11 of 50

Per Page

Sort By

2022 Climate Action Plan Implementation Progress Report

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) | April 30th, 2023

Summary

The CAP is a blueprint for how Metropolitan will cost-effectively reduce emissions from its operations, including those associated with water delivered through the Colora

The CAP is a blueprint for how Metropolitan will cost-effectively reduce emissions from its operations, including those associated with water delivered through the Colorado River Aqueduct (CRA).1 The CAP sets targets for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from Metropolitan’s operations, including conveyance, storage, treatment, and delivery of water to its 26 member water agencies across its 5,200 square-mile service area, and complements Metropolitan’s existing long-range planning efforts, including the Integrated Water Resources Plan, Energy Sustainability Plan, Capital Investment Plan, and the Climate Adaptation Master Plan for Water which is currently being developed.2,3,4 The CAP also helps Metropolitan prepare for future regulations while supporting California’s GHG emission reduction goals.

View Document Download Now Email

A Commitment to Action: Advancing Integrated Water Management in California

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | September 11th, 2013

Summary

This document highlights the key perspectives and recommendations that emerged during the Integrated Water Management Summit held in Sacramento on April 3, 2013. The Ca

This document highlights the key perspectives and recommendations that emerged during the Integrated Water Management Summit held in Sacramento on April 3, 2013. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) hosted the event in partnership with the Water Education Foundation and the California Water Commission, and would like to thank the 200+ attendees and guest speakers who participated in the Summit. The goal of the Summit was to bring together water leaders from myriad agencies and organizations to share experiences and ideas on how we can effectively align to provide sustainable water resources services in the State, in the face of an uncertain future. Most agree that the water management approaches we have been relying on for several decades are no longer sustainable given today’s economic climate, our changing environment and the need to supply safe drinking water, agricultural water and flood protection for a growing population, while also protecting and enhancing valuable environmental resources. The thoughtful presentations and informative discussions at the Summit served as an important milestone in the movement to shape a more cooperative and effective approach to water management in California. The Summit launched a new campaign called “Water 360” to help refocus and strengthen the collective efforts of California’s water management community by advancing integrated water management. Integrated water management is a framework for planning and implementation that melds the objectives of improving public safety, fostering environmental stewardship and supporting economic stability to lead to sustainable water resource management. Integrated water management is not a new concept in California, and great strides have been made in the last decade to utilize the approach, particularly at the regional level. The Water 360 Campaign builds on these early successes and calls for broader application across the entire state. DWR is prepared and committed to lead this effort in close partnership with other water leaders, particularly State, federal, and local agencies; and in collaboration with all stakeholders.

View Document Download Now Email

A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) | July 24th, 2009

Summary

A major problem worldwide is the potential loss of fisheries, forests, and water resources. Understanding of the processes that lead to improvements in or deterioration o

A major problem worldwide is the potential loss of fisheries, forests, and water resources. Understanding of the processes that lead to improvements in or deterioration of natural resources is limited, because scientific disciplines use different concepts and languages to describe and explain complex social-ecological systems (SESs). Without a common framework to organize findings, isolated knowledge does not cumulate. Until recently, accepted theory has assumed that resource users will never self-organize to maintain their resources and that governments must impose solutions. Research in multiple disciplines, however, has found that some government policies accelerate resource destruction, whereas some resource users have invested their time and energy to achieve sustainability. A general framework is used to identify 10 subsystem variables that affect the likelihood of self-organization in efforts to achieve a sustainable SES.

View Document Download Now Email

Adaptation Pathways: San Leandro Operational Landscape Unit

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | May 15th, 2022

Summary

Given the diverse uses and conditions of San Francisco Bay’s 400-mile shoreline, a framework is needed to guide development of adaptation strategies appropriate to loca

Given the diverse uses and conditions of San Francisco Bay’s 400-mile shoreline, a framework is needed to guide development of adaptation strategies appropriate to local conditions. Operational Landscape Units (OLUs), outlined for the San Francisco Bay in the San Francisco Bay Shoreline Adaptation Atlas (SFEI and SPUR 2019), share common physical characteristics and therefore can benefit from being managed as individual units. OLUs cross traditional jurisdictional boundaries (cities, counties), and instead follow the boundaries of natural processes like tides, waves, and sediment movement. By planning at the OLU scale, it is possible to prioritize adaptation strategies that work synergistically. Coordinated OLU planning can help avoid unintended impacts on neighboring locales and identify synergies to make use of limited resources in a more efficient manner.

View Document Download Now Email

Adaptation Planning for the Bay Point Operational Landscape Unit

San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) | April 15th, 2022

Summary

This document is not a vision or an adaptation plan, but rather is meant to catalyze discussion and offer resources around nature-based opportunities for SLR adaptation a

This document is not a vision or an adaptation plan, but rather is meant to catalyze discussion and offer resources around nature-based opportunities for SLR adaptation along Bay Point’s shoreline. The engagement and leadership of community-based stakeholders is key to the success of any adaptation planning effort, especially around issues as long-term and far-reaching as SLR and associated storm and tidal flooding. Without transparency and intentional community engagement throughout the planning process, opportunities for creative solutions will surely be missed and might lead to new problems or exacerbate existing ones disproportionately felt by low-income communities and communities of color. At the time this memo was written, there was not an active SLR adaptation working group or equivalent effort happening along the Bay Point shoreline. Consequently, the intent of this memo is to offer useful resources and ideas to support meaningful dialogue among stakeholders about shoreline adaptation planning. The Bay Point OLU study area is a mix of open space and developed areas at the mouth of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers, where the Delta meets the San Francisco Bay. The Bay Point OLU comprises unincorporated land known as Bay Point, a census-designated place within ContraCosta County, the City of Pittsburg, the spheres of influence of Pittsburg and Concord, and District V of Contra Costa County (Figure 2). Chapter 2 examines how Bay Point’s landscape has changed over time and Chapter 3 summarizes some of the vulnerability studies, habitat goals, and adaptation plans that have been developed for the study area. Chapter 4 offers more in-depth descriptions of the Bay Point OLU along with detailed maps that can be used to kick start SLR adaptation planning with a stakeholder working group along this reach of shoreline. Chapter 5 concludes with conceptual ideas that may be appropriate for different reaches of the shoreline, as a menu of possibilities to be further developed through a stakeholder process. Chapter 6 suggests ideas on next steps needed to move this work forward and offers a list of potential stakeholders as a starting place towards an adaptation working group to identify, evaluate, and prioritize adaptation strategies to manage flood risks along Bay Point’s shoreline.

View Document Download Now Email

Artes: An Integrated Model of Water Supply in L.A. County

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) | May 1st, 2017

Summary

Los Angeles faces a future with less imported water. Infrastructure and institutions will have to adapt. Understanding emerging policy and investment needs requires anal

Los Angeles faces a future with less imported water. Infrastructure and institutions will have to adapt. Understanding emerging policy and investment needs requires analysis across systems, a typically elusive goal within the diverse and disparately managed water systems of L.A. A more comprehensive analysis of water resources in Los Angeles requires an understanding of people, pipes, and plants. It could also be flexible to incorporate the fast-changing landscape of models, data, and analysis that the active agencies of the region continue to develop. With these goals in mind, we developed a water supply model for the metropolitan L.A. County region (Artes) to understand the potential for enhancing local water use across scenarios of demand and supply. The basic approach combines knowledge from engineering, hydrology, ecology, and sociology. The model is intentionally lightweight. Flexible and adaptive modeling can address many questions at multiple geographic scales, while also being able to incorporate new tools, data, and other models that are released. This model was developed to: * Determine how local groundwater, recycling and stormwater capture supplies could maximally meet water demands across L.A. County, based on current knowledge of hydrology and hydrogeology * Analyze tradeoffs in per capita water demand and available imported water supplies * Investigate system-wide effects of increased conservation * Minimize assumptions regarding data gaps * Use modeling to highlight to key gaps in scientific understanding, while creatively addressing the shortfalls in a precautionary manner. For instance, we compare modeled and historic groundwater pumping and managed aquifer recharge to assess the potential for groundwater overdraft. This manual describes important information for understanding model operations, assumptions, inputs, and outputs. The manual version (3.7) was written after development of 3 versions code for different research studies, which are in press or under review.

View Document Download Now Email

Assumptions and Estimates for California Water Plan Update 2023 (Draft)

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | October 14th, 2022

Summary

The draft Assumptions and Estimates for California Water Plan Update 2023 (draft A&E Report) describes key assumptions and estimates, data and data sources; improvements

The draft Assumptions and Estimates for California Water Plan Update 2023 (draft A&E Report) describes key assumptions and estimates, data and data sources; improvements to analytical tools, methods, and approaches; and the supporting documents and companion State plans being used to prepare California Water Plan Update 2023 (Update 2023), State government’s strategic plan for managing and developing water resources for sustainability and resilience. The draft A&E Report cites the statutory requirements for the California Water Plan (Water Plan), key legislative and policy drivers, assumptions, and estimates related to water data portfolios, future scenarios, water accounting, watershed resilience planning, and equity in water resource management. Also discussed are resource management strategies, the alignment of integrated watershed programs and plans, and integration and alignment of State plans.

View Document Download Now Email

Bringing Water and Land Use Together

Local Government Commission | April 11th, 2019

Summary

In 2005, the California Legislature passed new laws that enable communities to join together to adopt Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) policies and practices.

In 2005, the California Legislature passed new laws that enable communities to join together to adopt Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) policies and practices. This comprehensive planning approach considers water resources in the context of an interconnected watershed with a network of regional governance, rather than as a combination of fragmented parts. Unfortunately, the IRWM program is dominated by the water sector and in most regions has not pursued alignment with land use. Similarly, the Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCS) mandated through SB 375 establish a framework for aligning land use practices (predominantly housing and transportation) across jurisdictions within a larger geographic region. Yet very few SCSs have taken water resources into account. While water management and land-use planning remain highly fragmented across the state, we are making progress toward a more integrated approach, especially when setting new state-level policies, regulations and guidance. The 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) is a leap forward in this direction. For the first time, local land use agencies have an opportunity to be full partners with water agencies in shaping groundwater governance. It is too soon to determine how well these two sectors are integrating under SGMA, but early results are promising.

View Document Download Now Email

Bulletin 132-77 The California State Water Project -- 1976 Activities and Future Management Plans

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | November 30th, 1977

Summary

The 1975-76 and 1976-77 water years (a water year begins October 1 and extends through September 30) were the first years of critical water shortage since operation of th

The 1975-76 and 1976-77 water years (a water year begins October 1 and extends through September 30) were the first years of critical water shortage since operation of the State Water Project began in 1962. The shortage of new water supplies, which are far below the quantities normally expected during the winter and early spring seasons, has had far-reaching effects. The management of available State Water Project supplies on a day-to-day basis is critical during these times, for we must make most efficient use of available water supplies including the maintenance of water quality in the Delta as required by law. Although we don't know what next year may bring, we must prepare for another season of minimum precipitation. A public awareness program has been a part of the Department's responsibilities during the current drought, and we have done everything possible to inform the public of the critical situation at hand. The drought program has kept our water contractors and the people of California current with evaluations of what can be expected from the State Water Project during 1976 and within the foreseeable future.

View Document Download Now Email

Bulletin 132-78 The California State Water Project -- 1977 Activities and Future Management Plans

California Department of Water Resources (DWR) | October 31st, 1978

Summary

1977 was a bittersweet year for the State Water Project. The worst drought in our State's history limited our ability to serve our 31 water service contractors; yet at th

1977 was a bittersweet year for the State Water Project. The worst drought in our State's history limited our ability to serve our 31 water service contractors; yet at the same time the largest water exchange in the history of the State took place between urban users in the San Francisco Bay area, agricultural users in the San Joaquin Valley, and The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California with San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, Coachella Valley County Water District, and Desert Water Agency. This greatly helped to significantly reduce the magnitude of the shortage.

View Document Download Now Email

Page : 1

Type

Best Management Practice (1)
Bulletin (2)
California Water Plan (1)
Case study (4)
Conference proceedings (1)
Essay (2)
Fact sheet (1)
Handbook/Guide (1)
Issue Paper (2)
Journal Article (11)
Letter (1)
Manual (1)
Memo (1)
Model (3)
Plan (11)
Policy (1)
Report (14)
Strategy (3)
Technical Report (1)

Topic

Adaptive Management (1)
Agriculture (2)
Climate Change (10)
Drought & Hydrology (7)
Ecosystem & Species Management (3)
Environmental Justice (1)
Fisheries (2)
Flood Management (4)
Groundwater (8)
Infrastructure (4)
Integrated Regional Water Management (31)
Landscape Reform (2)
Levees (1)
Modeling (4)
People & Water (3)
Planning & Management (30)
Policy (1)
Recycled Water (4)
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (5)
Salinity (1)
Sanitation (1)
Science Management (3)
Storage (2)
Stormwater (6)
Transfers & Markets (3)
Tribal Water Issues (1)
Water & Energy (1)
Water Project Operations (5)
Water Quality (9)
Water Rights, Water Law (3)
Water Supply (20)
Water Use & Efficiency (14)

Keywords

adjudicated basins (1)
agriculture (2)
agriculture water use and efficiency (1)
California Water Plan (1)
Central Valley (3)
Central Valley Project (CVP) (1)
climate change (8)
Colorado River (4)
conjunctive use (3)
desalination (1)
direct potable reuse (1)
drought (6)
economic analysis (2)
ecosystem management (2)
fisheries (2)
flood management (4)
floodplain restoration (3)
funding (1)
Groundwater Exchange (8)
groundwater pumping impacts (2)
groundwater recharge (4)
infrastructure (5)
Integrated Regional Water Management (50)
land use (1)
managed aquifer recharge (MAR) - also see Groundwater Recharge (1)
modeling (4)
nature-based solutions (1)
outreach and engagement (2)
planning and management (14)
pollutants (1)
public trust doctrine (1)
recycled water (4)
risk assessment (1)
Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta (3)
salinity (1)
science management (1)
sea level rise (2)
State Water Project (SWP) (3)
storage (3)
stormwater (6)
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) (2)
Transfers - See Water Markets (1)
tribal water issues (1)
urban water conservation (16)
wastewater (1)
water and energy (1)
water markets (1)
water project operations (3)
water quality (3)
water supply (10)

Publisher

Accelerate Resilience LA (ARLA) (1)
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1)
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (4)
California Department of Water Resources (DWR) (11)
Environmental Engineering Science (Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.) (1)
Environmental Management (Springer) (1)
Geo Journal (Springer) (1)
Little Hoover Commission (1)
Local Government Commission (1)
Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) (2)
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power (LADWP) (1)
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) (5)
Mojave Water Agency (MWA) (3)
Mono Lake Committee (1)
Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature) (2)
Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) (1)
Sage Journals (1)
San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) (2)
Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) (1)
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) (4)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1)
University of California, Davis (UC Davis) (1)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) (2)
Water, Multidisciplinary Publishing Institute (MDPI) (1)

Basin

Ames Valley 7-016 (1)
Bessemer Valley 7-015 (1)
Caves Canyon Valley 6-038 (2)
Coastal Plain of Los Angeles - Central 4-011.04 (1)
Coastal Plain of Los Angeles - Hollywood 4-011.02 (1)
Coastal Plain of Los Angeles - Santa Monica 4-011.01 (1)
Coastal Plain of Los Angeles - West Coast 4-011.03 (1)
Copper Mountain Valley 7-011 (2)
Coyote Lake Valley 6-037 (2)
Cronise Valley 6-035 (1)
Cuddeback Valley 6-050 (2)
Dale Valley 7-009 (2)
Deadman Valley - Deadman Lake 7-013.01 (2)
Deadman Valley - Surprise Spring 7-013.02 (2)
El Mirage Valley 6-043 (1)
Fremont Valley 6-046 (2)
Harper Valley 6-047 (2)
Iron Ridge Area 7-050 (2)
Johnson Valley - Soggy Lake 7-018.01 (3)
Johnson Valley - Upper Johnson Valley 7-018.02 (3)
Joshua Tree 7-062 (2)
Kane Wash Area 6-089 (2)
Langford Valley - Irwin 6036.02 (2)
Langford Valley - Langford Well Lake 6-036.01 (2)
Langford Valley 6-036.02 (2)
Lower Kingston Valley 6-021 (1)
Lower Mojave River Valley 6-040 (3)
Lucerne Valley 7-019 (2)
Means Valley 7-017 (2)
Mesquite Valley 6-029 (1)
Middle Mojave River Valley 6-041 (2)
Morongo Valley 7-020 (2)
Palo Verde Valley 7-038 (1)
San Fernando Valley 4-012 (1)
San Gabriel Valley 4-013 (1)
Twentynine Palms Valley 7-010 (2)
Upper Mojave River Valley 6-042 (2)
Warren Valley 7-012 (3)

Hydrological Region

Central Coast (6)
Colorado River (9)
Lower Basin States and Mexico - Colorado River (5)
National (3)
North Coast (2)
North Lahontan (2)
Sacramento River (8)
San Francisco Bay (8)
San Joaquin River (9)
South Coast (24)
South Lahontan (8)
Tulare Lake (6)
Upper Basin States - Colorado River (2)

Reset

Search for:

CONTACT